CAUTION: Do not abuse the word ROI
19 August, 2008
Kshitiz Randhir Shori, Director, Asia Pacific Sales, Jivox Software Thanks to Google, the word ROI has gained so much popularity that suddenly there are a number of start-up online companies opening their offices and trying to win clients on terms like ROI without knowing the fact that this very lure of winning clients on ROI is nothing but a deadly trap with more chances of losing clients than retaining them.
I am certainly not against the term ROI; indeed ROI is the backbone of every business, a measurement of success or failure. But what I really dislike is the way it’s being misused in our industry especially by some of the new start-up online agencies. For them the use of ROI is limited to generating a x number of leads, calculating the cost per lead and presenting such reports as value for money, as an online strategy, and as a media plan. We all are proud and lucky to be part of an industry which is brutally transparent, easily measurable and traceable but it seems this level of transparency is being negatively exploited to earn quick bucks and as a result is working more against the agencies than in favour of them.
The trouble begins when we go overboard in using the term ROI and go beyond CPM and CTR’s. Now a days, the media plan doesn’t end at No. of Impressions, CPM and estimated CTR but we added two more advertiser friendly metrics namely CPC, Estimated Leads and CPL (courtesy Google ad words), by this approach we are indeed striking more deals and adding more number of clients but at the same time we are unable to retain them because of their growing unrealistic expectations and this ROI model is becoming more of a curse in disguise.
And what are those unrealistic expectations? Linking ROI to metrics like Cost per lead or Cost per Conversion and worse, not thinking beyond such terms as definition of ROI. I mean how can we fully control cost per lead? How can we be held accountable for something on which we have no control? As an online media agency, our job is to strive to reach an optimal exposure frequency where awareness becomes consideration and consideration, in turn, yields a conversion. To move from awareness and to get into the consideration mindset, a lot depends on product positioning, product acceptance in the market or pricing etc.
What some advertisers fail to understand or consciously do not want to understand and what we as online agencies fail to make them understand is that, internet media has a lot more to offer as ROI than just plain numbers. We all know that we have an edge over Print/TV; even with all the TAM & TNS scores of the world, no other medium is as measurable and as interactive as online media. Yet we succumb to advertisers claim on media reach being miniscule as compared to offline media, I agree we are too small but we are far too effective in reaching out to 30 million internet users, ok if you persist, 15 odd million active users. Users whom we can engage, influence and try get into their consideration mindset and all this can be tracked and measured that is value for money and clients need to understand this.
Advertisers need to recognize ROI not only in terms of direct response but also as increase in share of voice, to ensure positive ROI, we need to use this medium to constantly engage the users with the brand to create brand loyalty, to be and always remain in the consideration set for eg. www.sunsilkgangofgirls.com , www.theaxeaffect.com, Nokia. I mean, look at the levels they have reached in terms of engaging the users, every second, every minute they are building brand ambassadors like you and me, vouching for the brands and disruptively spreading the message across other people. Can we ever directly measure the impact of such brilliant creative thought and media execution? May be not, as this approach is slow and time consuming, it requires in depth thinking, patience and a lot of money to keep generating new ideas to engage the user.
Very few agencies manage to present ROI in its right perspective while others just link ROI to the number of leads generated, their media plans always talk about expected CTR’s, leads and cost per lead.
For advertisers, investing in online media is like investing in a good mutual fund with a systematic investment plan, wherein the advertisers must invest a certain percentage of their total marketing budget but very importantly on a regular basis. This is important to constantly engage with the user and remain in their consideration mind set. The investments should not be on ad-hoc basis with the sole purpose of driving immediate response as in that case the response will always be unpredictable and fluctuating just as in the case of investing in direct stocks, some investments will reap benefits while some will not, leading to a point of saturation.
Online Media is an investment opportunity. Therefore, think like a venture capitalist. Invest in innovation.












Many executives find that very high ROI values are unbelievable. Their reference point is the typical capital investment, where the hurdle rate in North America is typically in the 15 to 20 percent range. When a project delivers 200 to 300 percent or more, the common reaction is disbelief. But high values can and do happen.
designer jeans
Cost per lead or Cost per Conversion is not the term that will accountable for ROI. Linking ROI to these metrics are not fair.
This ROI thingy is so prevalent in the BFSI sector, that they have such a bargaining power to lower the CPL from agency to agency...it is the clients who are pampered by these so called ROI oriented agencies that the virus is spreading to entertainment n media sector too...why should an online agency fight to gain a client on basis of CPA quotations where in the offline it is all about creativity and in media about retainership fees...majority of advertisers spend more than 95% of their advtg budget in offline mediums with zero % accuracy of ROI measurement and the hardly spent amount on internet is where they expect 95% effectivity or ROI...this is utterly foolish way of doing biz...the net is a beautiful medium to build brands, immense potential to showcase creativity and interact & engage with the audience...i think it is high time that the Indian internet industry get together to stop this suicidal wave...and build a cleaner working environment
Well said. If only advertisers would understand the effectiveness, flexibility and value of online ads! The true power of internet as a media will be realised when they are ready to pay rates comparable to what it costs them in other media.
Actually the RoI hype is created by some agencies- most 'traditional' agencies have been hit by the digital scene hard and are scrambling to position themselves as forward looking and 'digitally savvy'- and to appear likewise, they wear a garb. Think of it as being akin to a 70 year old man wearing torn jeans and thinking that the girl (consumers or the client) will be wooed easily.
Fogetting that this is a mindset and fake cannot cover ineptness.
Garbs like "We are the RoI agency" are abound in positioning statements- what do they actually do that signifies RoI? Nothing. Zilch. Zero. Nada.
They create hype, embarrass themselves and embarrass other 'true' service providers.
Anyone knows any such agency proclaiming to be RoI agency but actually is the old-hog in torn jeans?
@Kshitiz - Your points are quite valid.In my views main reason behind the hype of "ROI" word is the throat cutting competition in online industry. Look at the agencies around you their marketing pitch starts with "ROI" ,they always try to offer something which cant be done, which leads to over expection from Merchants and finaly disappointments for both sides!
Kshitiz you are very true on your statment..... Online media planners should have to think for branding perspective..if you consider Internet media it is fast, 24x7, targeted, and maximum reaching media at very low cost.
If you concentrates on branding then ultimately you can generate leads...
All ad types can be effective... depending on your Enrollment goals
the ad agencies first have to know what the client needs... what is his objective is he building a brand online or the advertiser need a lead generation tool for his budget... different marketing metrics are needed for online programs based on the advertiser needs...
we need a balance of online(CPM, CPC, CPL etc) and offline ads will depend on many factors... advertisers have to understand online & offline and use the advantages of each.
it addresses the root cause of destruction and over hyped CPL.
We are in the better medium where in ROI is measurable. The current stage of CPL prices when compared to other medium is just 10% of what other mediums are giving. We have to be in winning position and this addresses the execution of media plan of companies in favour of online medium, where in the audiences are relevant for the plans
amazing article Kshitiz, you hit the nail right in the head - and well expressed !
its mostly the new age interactive agencies responsible for propagating this CPL demand - thts the weapon way for them to win business from the traditional agencies - the traditional agency's digital arms are too forced to get into the trap - and it becomes a you loose i win situation !
Imagine the same advertiser spending millions in offline advertisements for branding, and having audacity to demand CPL when it comes to its digital media plan !!!
CPL per se isnt a bad concept - but its over exploited - branding clients now dont wanna spend on internet - as they feel its a small CPL platform !!!
Post new comment